| Substantive Knowledge (Critical Thinking) 30% |
Thoroughly researched; demonstrates in-depth knowledge; presents unique ideas; consistently relevant and aligned with policy; uses impressive vocabulary; delivers concise and clear points. The delegate offers insights beyond typical expectations. |
The substantive content shows solid research; ideas meet expected standards; the points and facts are accurate and relevant; generally adheres to policy; informative and persuasive without being aggressive or promoting propaganda.
|
The content provides basic information that could benefit from further research; tends to be repetitive and lacks originality; contains no glaring inaccuracies or propaganda, but is unclear at times.
|
The content offers minimal information and lacks substance; requires much more research; lacks innovation; frequently off-topic or strays from policy; repetitive with some incorrect information and generally unclear.
|
| Leadership and Diplomacy: Lobbying and Negotiation (Leadership, Negotiation, and Teamwork Skills) 20% |
The delegate consistently shows thoughtfulness and respect for differing viewpoints; inclusive and supportive; always diplomatic and never dismissive; demonstrates exceptional leadership and diplomacy skills beyond what is typically expected.
|
The delegate made efforts to consider different viewpoints; generally polite and respectful, demonstrating the expected level of leadership skills..
|
The delegate showed minimal diplomacy but refrained from making offensive remarks; generally polite. Displayed some leadership qualities, but their efforts were overshadowed by others.
|
The delegate lacked diplomacy; was combative, argumentative, and rude; dismissed or ridiculed other perspectives and opinions; made derogatory remarks specific to certain countries; overall impolite.
|
| Use of Procedure 20% |
The delegate demonstrates outstanding mastery of procedures, with a flawless grasp of rules, protocols, and decorum. They consistently follow established guidelines, ensuring efficient proceedings. Their remarkable attention to detail in all aspects, from submitting motions to voting, shows a strong dedication to procedural accuracy. Their exemplary behavior sets a high standard for professionalism and engagement, showcasing a level of ROP expertise that exceeds expectations.
|
Meets the required criteria and standards. Exhibits adequate clarity and organization, effectively guiding the debate by utilizing proper procedures.
|
Gradually reaching the expected standards. Although clarity, organization, and the ability to communicate complex ideas could improve, the work shows advancement. Attention to detail and compliance with legal and policy frameworks are progressing, but further enhancement is needed.
|
The delegate did not review the ROP and was completely lost throughout the session.
|
| Writing Skills: Amendment and Resolution Drafting (Writing Skills) 15% |
Exhibits outstanding clarity, precision, and organization. Every amendment and resolution is carefully constructed, reflecting a deep understanding of legal and policy frameworks. Their creative and original approach offers new insights into complex issues. With a polished presentation and meticulous attention to detail, the writing establishes an impressive standard of excellence. The delegate shows exemplary writing skills that exceed expectations.
|
Displays a competent command of writing skills, with satisfactory clarity, organization, and precision. Effectively communicates complex ideas, enhancing the proposals' impact. Attention to detail and compliance with legal and policy frameworks are sufficient.
|
Making strides in drafting amendments and resolutions. Clarity and writing skills are improving, but additional progress is necessary to meet the standards.
|
Falls short of expectations in drafting amendments and resolutions. Clarity is limited, and communication is ineffective. Substantial improvement is required to meet the standards.
|
| Verbal skills and Eloquence (Public Speaking Skills) 15% |
Professional, articulate, and well-spoken; engaging, humorous, compelling, persuasive, and dynamic. The delegate exhibits outstanding verbal skills and eloquence that exceed expectations.
|
Overall, the delivery is articulate and the posture is good; generally persuasive, though not exceptionally dynamic but still effective; did not frequently use "um."
|
Generally informative but hesitant and tentative; displayed a lack of enthusiasm while reading the paper with minimal eye contact; used "um" too frequently; had poor posture and was not particularly persuasive.
|
Poor quality; just read paper; little emphasis; little eye contact; distracting and/or inappropriate posture; (slouched); said “um” too often.
|
 white.png){kind=logo}
